RESUMEN
Introduction: Oral cancer represents a significant global public health concern, with the death rate for lip and oral cavity malignancies experiencing a 1.40-fold increase worldwide in the past three decades. This retrospective study aimed to comprehensively understand overall survival (OS) and the influence of sociodemographic and clinical factors on patients diagnosed with oral cavity cancer. Materials and methods: The study focused on oral cancer patients enrolled in 2016 and treated at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, with a follow-up period extending to 5 years until 2021. Utilising the Kaplan-Meier technique and log-rank test, we examined OS and variations based on sociodemographic factors, while the Cox proportional hazard model allowed us to investigate the simultaneous impact of multiple factors on OS. Results: A total of 1,895 eligible participants were included. The overall 5-year survival rate was 65%. After adjusting for age, gender, education, primary site, tumour grade, TNM staging, treatment intention, status and modality, we found in our study oral cancer patients aged more than 60 years (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01-1.85, p-value 0.03), patients who had poorly differentiated carcinoma (HR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.56-3.81, p-value < 0.001), belonged to stage IV as per TNM staging (HR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.65-3.61, p-value < 0.001), patient who have received partial treatment (HR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.65-3.61, p-value < 0.001) and only chemotherapy (HR = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.43-5.23, p-value < 0.001) found to have a higher hazard of dying while literate (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.95, p-value 0.02) are protective. Limitations: The retrospective nature of the study posed constraints in exploring additional variable associations. Implication: Overall early detection, appropriate treatment, and regular follow-up are critical for improving the survival rate of patients with oral cavity cancer. Conclusion: This research proposes that improving the socioeconomic status and promoting proactive treatment-seeking behaviour is crucial for enhancing the survival of oral cancer patients. Cancer hospitals, in collaboration with the wider public healthcare system in India, which includes clinicians and policymakers, should consider these suggestions to enhance cancer treatment and control in low-middle-income countries.
RESUMEN
Background: In India, cervical cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer incidence among women. Socioeconomic factors play a vital role in cervical cancer survival. Objectives: This study assessed the role of education and income on disparities in time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) and its impact on cervical cancer survival. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective facility-based record study conducted among newly treated cervical cancer patients registered in a tertiary medical care center in Mumbai between 2014 and 2016. Adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. Results: In total, 1947 cervical cancer patients with a mean age of 52.89 (±10.55) years were included. The average number of days for TTI among highly educated patients was 27 versus 35 days for patients with no formal education. An increasing trend in survival was observed as education levels shift from no formal to higher education category (75.54%, 77.30%, and 85.10%, P = 0.01). All cause mortality was lower in cervical cancer patients with secondary education and above than illiterates (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63, P < 0.01), among those with higher income (HR = 0.78, P = 0.04) than lower income and among who started on treatment within 30 days (HR = 0.90, P = 0.29) than patients who started treated after 30 days. Conclusions: Inferior survival is found for cervical cancer patients with lower education and income and who initiated treatment after 30 days. Hence, it is important to improve awareness and screening activities, especially among the lower socioeconomic groups, for early diagnosis and better treatment outcomes.
